Cost-Benefit Analysis with AI
Learn how to conduct effective cost-benefit analyses with Finyna
Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a systematic approach to estimating the strengths and weaknesses of alternatives by determining the benefits and costs of decisions. It's used to determine options that provide the best approach to achieve benefits while preserving savings.
Finyna can help you build comprehensive cost-benefit analyses for various scenarios, including pricing strategies, expansion plans, investment projects, and more. With AI assistance, you can identify all relevant costs and benefits, quantify them accurately, and make optimal decisions based on sound financial reasoning.
How to Use Finyna for Cost-Benefit Analysis
Below are examples of effective prompts for different cost-benefit scenarios, along with sample responses from our AI assistant. These examples demonstrate how to structure your queries to get the most useful analysis and insights.
Pricing Strategy Analysis
I'd be happy to help you build a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis for your SaaS pricing strategies. This type of analysis is crucial for maximizing both customer adoption and revenue.
Approach to SaaS Pricing Strategy Analysis
Let's create a structured analysis that considers all key factors in SaaS pricing decisions:
Step 1: Define Key Assumptions & Inputs
First, we need to establish base assumptions for each pricing strategy:
Input Parameter | Low Price ($29) | Mid-Price ($49) | Premium ($79) |
---|---|---|---|
Monthly Price | $29 | $49 | $79 |
Est. Customer Acquisition Cost | $150 | $200 | $300 |
Est. Monthly Customers (Year 1) | 1,000 | 700 | 400 |
Annual Growth Rate | 20% | 15% | 10% |
Churn Rate (Monthly) | 3.5% | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Avg. Customer Lifetime (Months) | 28.6 | 40.0 | 66.7 |
Development Costs for Add'l Features | $0 | $50,000 | $150,000 |
Monthly Support Cost per Customer | $3 | $5 | $8 |
Infrastructure Cost per Customer | $2 | $2 | $4 |
Step 2: Calculate Key Metrics for Each Strategy
Next, let's analyze the three-year performance of each pricing strategy:
Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) Growth
Period | Low Price ($29) | Mid-Price ($49) | Premium ($79) |
---|---|---|---|
Year 1 - End | $263,785 | $301,315 | $269,447 |
Year 2 - End | $618,050 | $656,095 | $543,178 |
Year 3 - End | $1,213,830 | $1,206,650 | $941,703 |
3-Year CAGR | 114.4% | 100.3% | 87.0% |
Customer Metrics
Metric | Low Price ($29) | Mid-Price ($49) | Premium ($79) |
---|---|---|---|
Customers (Year 3 End) | 41,856 | 24,626 | 11,920 |
CAC Payback Period (Months) | 6.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) | $685 | $1,761 | $4,477 |
LTV:CAC Ratio | 4.57 | 8.80 | 14.92 |
Profitability Analysis
Metric | Low Price ($29) | Mid-Price ($49) | Premium ($79) |
---|---|---|---|
3-Year Cumulative Revenue | $22,417,355 | $23,432,855 | $18,913,595 |
3-Year Customer Acquisition Cost | $6,375,000 | $4,900,000 | $3,900,000 |
3-Year Operating Costs | $9,275,425 | $7,387,950 | $5,436,025 |
3-Year Net Profit | $6,766,930 | $11,094,905 | $9,427,570 |
Profit Margin | 30.2% | 47.3% | 49.8% |
Step 3: Excel Implementation
Here are the key formulas for your Excel model:
1. Customer Growth with Churn:
excel=IF(previous_month=0, initial_customers, (previous_month*(1-churn_rate)+new_customers))
2. Monthly Recurring Revenue:
excel=total_customers*monthly_price
3. Lifetime Value Calculation:
excel=(monthly_price-monthly_costs)*(1/churn_rate)
4. Net Present Value of Each Strategy:
excel=NPV(discount_rate, monthly_cash_flows) - initial_investment
5. ROI Calculation:
excel=(3_year_revenue - total_costs) / total_costs
Step 4: Risk Analysis
Let's evaluate the key risks and advantages of each pricing strategy:
Strategy | Pros | Cons | Risk Level |
---|---|---|---|
Low Price ($29) | • Fastest customer growth • Largest market share • Highest total revenue by Year 3 | • Lowest profit margin • Higher churn rate • Lower customer lifetime value | Medium-High |
Mid-Price ($49) | • Best balance of volume & margin • Highest cumulative profit • Strong LTV:CAC ratio | • May miss both budget & premium segments • Medium competitive differentiation | Low |
Premium ($79) | • Highest profit margin • Lowest churn rate • Highest LTV:CAC ratio | • Slower growth • Smaller addressable market • Higher feature development costs | Medium |
Step 5: Sensitivity Analysis
I've created a sensitivity analysis for the Mid-Price option, showing how net profit changes with different churn and conversion rates:
3-Year Net Profit ($M) | Conversion Rate | ||
---|---|---|---|
Churn Rate | -20% | Base Case | +20% |
+2% (4.5%) | $6.78 | $8.32 | $9.86 |
Base (2.5%) | $9.03 | $11.09 | $13.16 |
-1% (1.5%) | $11.70 | $14.51 | $17.32 |
Step 6: Recommendation
Based on the comprehensive analysis, the Mid-Price ($49) strategy appears optimal because:
- It provides the highest 3-year cumulative profit at $11.09M
- It offers a balanced approach with strong unit economics (LTV:CAC ratio of 8.8)
- It minimizes risk compared to other options
- It allows room for both upselling and occasional promotions
Implementation Considerations:
- Consider a freemium tier to feed the acquisition funnel
- Build in an upgrade path from the $49 tier to premium features
- Create annual pricing options at a 15-20% discount to improve cash flow and reduce churn
Would you like me to expand on any aspect of this analysis, such as developing a more detailed monthly cash flow projection or exploring a hybrid pricing approach?
Facility Expansion Analysis
I'd be happy to help you analyze your facility expansion options. This is a significant capital decision that requires thorough cost-benefit analysis across multiple dimensions.
Manufacturing Facility Expansion Analysis
Let's create a comprehensive analysis comparing your two options:
Step 1: Establish Key Parameters
First, let's define the core parameters for both options:
Parameter | Option A: Expand Current | Option B: New Automated Facility |
---|---|---|
Initial Investment | $5,000,000 | $12,000,000 |
Additional Annual Capacity | 500,000 units | 1,200,000 units |
Expected Facility Lifespan | 15 years | 25 years |
Construction Timeframe | 8 months | 18 months |
Production Disruption | 15% for 3 months | None |
Annual Labor Costs | $2,200,000 | $1,400,000 |
Annual Maintenance | $350,000 | $500,000 |
Energy Efficiency | Current standard | 30% improvement |
Annual Energy Costs | $600,000 | $525,000 |
Quality Improvement | Minimal | Est. 20% defect reduction |
Tax Incentives Available | Minimal | $1,500,000 |
Step 2: 10-Year Financial Projection
Let's analyze the 10-year financial performance of both options:
Metric | Option A: Expand Current | Option B: New Automated Facility |
---|---|---|
Initial Investment | $5,000,000 | $12,000,000 |
Production Disruption Cost | $825,000 | $0 |
10-Year Revenue Potential | $48,750,000 | $105,300,000 |
10-Year Labor Costs | $22,000,000 | $14,000,000 |
10-Year Maintenance | $3,500,000 | $5,000,000 |
10-Year Energy Costs | $6,000,000 | $5,250,000 |
10-Year Quality-Related Savings | $0 | $4,200,000 |
Tax Benefits | $750,000 | $1,500,000 |
Total 10-Year Cash Flow | $12,175,000 | $69,750,000 |
Net Present Value (8% discount) | $5,826,430 | $28,134,750 |
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) | 21.4% | 37.2% |
Payback Period | 4.6 years | 3.3 years |
Step 3: Excel Implementation
Here are the key formulas for your Excel model:
1. Net Present Value (NPV) Calculation:
excel=NPV(discount_rate, cash_flow_range) + initial_investment
2. Internal Rate of Return (IRR):
excel=IRR(values, [guess])
3. Payback Period Calculation:
excel=MATCH(TRUE,cumulative_cash_flow>=0,0)/periods_per_year
4. Production Disruption Cost:
excel=current_monthly_profit*disruption_percentage*disruption_months
5. Annual Cost Savings Comparison:
excel=SUM(option_a_costs) - SUM(option_b_costs)
Step 4: Non-Financial Considerations
Beyond pure financial metrics, consider these factors:
Consideration | Option A: Expand Current | Option B: New Automated Facility |
---|---|---|
Future Flexibility | Limited additional expansion potential | Designed for future growth |
Workforce Impact | Maintains current workforce size | 35% reduction in labor needs |
Environmental Impact | Minimal improvement | Significant efficiency gains |
Supply Chain Integration | Unchanged | Opportunity to optimize |
Competitive Positioning | Maintains status quo | Potential market advantage |
Risk Factors | Lower financial risk Production disruption Space constraints | Higher financial exposure Technology implementation Longer timeframe |
Technological Advantage | Minimal | Significant automation benefits |
Step 5: Sensitivity Analysis for Option B
I've created a sensitivity analysis showing how NPV changes with variations in key parameters:
NPV ($M) | Capacity Utilization | ||
---|---|---|---|
Discount Rate | 70% | 80% | 90% |
6% | $26.4M | $31.8M | $37.2M |
8% | $21.5M | $28.1M | $33.8M |
10% | $17.6M | $22.9M | $28.2M |
Step 6: Expansion Timeline Comparison
Timeline Milestone | Option A: Expand Current | Option B: New Automated Facility |
---|---|---|
Planning & Permitting | 2-3 months | 4-6 months |
Construction | 5-6 months | 12-14 months |
Equipment Installation | 1-2 months | 3-4 months |
Testing & Calibration | 2 weeks | 4-6 weeks |
Staff Training | Minimal | 2-3 months |
Full Operation | Month 9 | Month 19 |
Step 7: Recommendations
Based on the comprehensive analysis, Option B: New Automated Facility provides superior long-term value despite the higher initial investment, because:
-
Superior Financial Returns: Higher NPV by $22.3M, higher IRR (37.2% vs 21.4%), and faster payback period despite larger investment
-
Strategic Advantages:
- Significantly higher production capacity (+1.2M vs +0.5M units)
- Labor cost savings of $800,000 annually
- No production disruption during construction
- Modern technology with quality improvements
- Longer facility lifespan (25 vs 15 years)
-
Risk Mitigation Strategy:
- Phase construction to allow partial operation sooner
- Secure fixed-price contracts with vendors to limit cost escalation
- Implement gradual automation transition to minimize disruption
- Design with modularity to allow staged investment
Implementation Considerations:
- Negotiate additional government incentives for job training and environmental improvements
- Consider financing options to optimize capital deployment
- Develop a comprehensive transition plan for workforce adjustments
- Explore potential sale or repurposing of the current facility
Would you like me to elaborate on any aspect of this analysis? For example, I could develop a more detailed monthly cash flow projection, explore financing options, or analyze different capacity utilization scenarios.
New Product Investment Analysis
I'd be happy to help you structure a thorough cost-benefit analysis for your potential $2M product line investment. This type of capital allocation decision requires a comprehensive evaluation of both financial returns and strategic benefits.
New Product Investment Analysis Framework
Let's create a structured analysis to determine whether this investment meets your financial and strategic objectives:
Step 1: Establish Core Assumptions
First, let's organize all the key assumptions for the investment:
Parameter | Value | Notes |
---|---|---|
Initial Investment | $2,000,000 | Upfront development cost |
Project Timeline | 5+ years | Initial analysis period |
First Year Revenue | $800,000 | From market research |
Year 5 Revenue | $3,000,000 | From market research |
Annual Revenue Growth | ~39% | Calculated CAGR based on targets |
Gross Margin | 35% | Across all years |
R&D Timeline | 9 months | Estimated development period |
Operating Expenses | 15% of revenue | Sales, marketing, support |
Tax Rate | 25% | Corporate tax rate |
Discount Rate | 12% | Reflecting risk & opportunity cost |
Terminal Value Multiple | 5x | For ongoing business valuation |
Step 2: 5-Year Financial Projection
Let's create detailed year-by-year projections:
Metric | Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | $0 | $800,000 | $1,112,800 | $1,548,000 | $2,152,000 | $3,000,000 |
Growth Rate | - | - | 39.1% | 39.1% | 39.0% | 39.4% |
COGS | $0 | $520,000 | $723,320 | $1,006,200 | $1,398,800 | $1,950,000 |
Gross Profit | $0 | $280,000 | $389,480 | $541,800 | $753,200 | $1,050,000 |
Gross Margin | - | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Operating Expenses | $0 | $120,000 | $166,920 | $232,200 | $322,800 | $450,000 |
EBITDA | $0 | $160,000 | $222,560 | $309,600 | $430,400 | $600,000 |
EBITDA Margin | - | 20.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Depreciation | $0 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 |
EBIT | $0 | ($240,000) | ($177,440) | ($90,400) | $30,400 | $200,000 |
Taxes | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $7,600 | $50,000 |
Net Income | $0 | ($240,000) | ($177,440) | ($90,400) | $22,800 | $150,000 |
Initial Investment | ($2,000,000) | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Flow | ($2,000,000) | $160,000 | $222,560 | $309,600 | $422,800 | $550,000 |
Cumulative Cash Flow | ($2,000,000) | ($1,840,000) | ($1,617,440) | ($1,307,840) | ($885,040) | ($335,040) |
Discounted Cash Flow | ($2,000,000) | $142,857 | $177,306 | $220,261 | $268,609 | $311,866 |
Terminal Value Calculation:
- Year 5 EBITDA: $600,000
- Terminal Multiple: 5x
- Terminal Value: $3,000,000
- Discounted Terminal Value: $1,701,991
Step 3: Investment Analysis Metrics
Financial Metric | Value | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Net Present Value (NPV) | $822,890 | Investment creates value |
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) | 18.4% | Above typical hurdle rate |
Payback Period | 6.6 years | Including terminal value |
Profitability Index | 1.41 | 1 invested |
Return on Investment (5-yr) | 31.7% | Total return over 5 years |
Breakeven Annual Revenue | $1,714,285 | Required for DCF positive |
Step 4: Excel Implementation
Here are the key formulas for your investment analysis model:
1. Projected Revenue Growth:
excel=B3*(1+growth_rate)
2. Net Present Value (NPV):
excel=NPV(discount_rate, year1_cash_flow:year5_cash_flow) + terminal_value/(1+discount_rate)^5 + initial_investment
3. Internal Rate of Return (IRR):
excel=IRR(initial_investment:year5_cf_plus_terminal)
4. EBITDA Calculation:
excel=Revenue*(gross_margin-opex_percentage)
5. Terminal Value:
excel=Year5_EBITDA*terminal_multiple
Step 5: Sensitivity Analysis
Let's analyze how key variables impact the NPV of the project:
NPV ($000s) | Gross Margin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Growth Rate | 30% | 35% | 40% |
30% | ($143) | $458 | $1,058 |
39% | $112 | $823 | $1,533 |
48% | $432 | $1,269 | $2,105 |
NPV ($000s) | Initial Investment | ||
---|---|---|---|
Discount Rate | $1.8M | $2.0M | $2.2M |
10% | $1,388 | $1,188 | $988 |
12% | $1,023 | $823 | $623 |
14% | $715 | $515 | $315 |
Step 6: Risk Assessment
Risk Factor | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
Development delays | Medium | Schedule slip, increased costs | Agile methodology, contingency budget |
Lower sales than projected | Medium | Reduced ROI, extended payback | Phased launch, market testing |
Margin pressure | Medium | Reduced profitability | Value-based pricing, cost engineering |
Competitive response | High | Market share challenges | Differentiation, IP protection, rapid iteration |
Regulatory changes | Low | Compliance costs | Regulatory monitoring, flexible design |
Step 7: Strategic Benefits Assessment
Beyond financial returns, consider these strategic benefits:
-
Portfolio Expansion
- Addresses new customer segments
- Reduces dependency on existing product lines
- Creates cross-selling opportunities
-
Market Position
- Strengthens competitive positioning
- Builds brand reputation
- Blocks competitor entry
-
Organizational Capabilities
- Develops new technical expertise
- Creates platform for future innovations
- Attracts new talent
Step 8: Recommendations
Based on the comprehensive analysis, this investment appears financially sound with positive strategic benefits:
-
Proceed with the $2M investment because:
- Positive NPV of $823K (41% return on investment)
- IRR of 18.4% exceeds typical hurdle rates
- Strategic benefits further enhance the value proposition
- Sensitivity analysis shows resilience to reasonable variances
-
Implementation strategy:
- Set clear stage gates for continued funding
- Implement quarterly performance reviews against projections
- Establish contingency plans for different market outcomes
- Consider a phased approach to limit initial exposure
-
Key performance indicators to track:
- Customer acquisition cost
- Conversion rates
- Customer lifetime value
- Market share gain
- Gross margin maintenance
Would you like me to elaborate on any specific aspect of this analysis, such as calculating the terminal value differently, exploring different growth scenarios, or developing a more detailed risk mitigation plan?
Product Discontinuation Analysis
I'll help you create a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis for potentially discontinuing your product line. This is an important strategic decision that requires careful consideration of both financial and non-financial factors.
Product Discontinuation Analysis Framework
Let's build a structured approach to evaluate whether discontinuing this product line is the right strategic move:
Step 1: Current Product Performance Assessment
First, let's establish the full picture of the product's current performance:
Metric | Current Value | Industry Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Annual Revenue | $1,200,000 | - |
Gross Margin | 12% ($144,000) | 35-40% |
Direct Costs | $1,056,000 | - |
Support Resources (FTE) | 3.5 | - |
Support Costs | $350,000 | - |
Allocated Overhead | $120,000 | - |
Net Profit | ($326,000) | - |
Customer Count | 85 | - |
Average Revenue per Customer | $14,118 | - |
Product Lifecycle Stage | Mature/Declining | - |
Revenue Trend | -5% annually | +8% industry avg |
Step 2: Discontinuation Impact Analysis
Now, let's analyze the impact of discontinuing the product:
Impact Area | Immediate Effect | Long-term Effect |
---|---|---|
Financial Impacts | ||
Lost Revenue | -$1,200,000 | Declining at 5% annually |
Cost Savings (Direct) | +$1,056,000 | Increasing at 3% annually |
Support Cost Savings | +$350,000 | Increasing at 2% annually |
Overhead Reallocation | +$90,000 | 75% of current allocation |
Wind-down Costs | -$175,000 | One-time expense |
Net Financial Impact | +$121,000 | Improving over time |
Resource Reallocation | ||
Staff Redeployment | 3.5 FTEs available | Potential $525K new revenue |
Manufacturing Capacity | 15% capacity freed | Opportunity for high-margin products |
Capital Equipment | $420K in assets | Potential reuse or $280K salvage |
Customer Impact | ||
Revenue at Risk (Cross-sell) | $425,000 | 20% of cross-sold products |
Strategic Accounts Affected | 12 accounts | $720K total relationship value |
Step 3: Excel Implementation
Here are the key formulas for your Excel analysis model:
1. True Product Profitability:
excel=Revenue*(Gross_Margin/100)-Support_Costs-Allocated_Overhead
2. 5-Year Projection (Status Quo):
excel=NPV(discount_rate, CF_year1:CF_year5)
Where CF_yearX = Revenue*(1-annual_decline)^X * Gross_Margin - Support_Costs*(1+cost_inflation)^X
3. 5-Year Projection (Post-Discontinuation):
excel=-Wind_down_costs+NPV(discount_rate, Reallocation_CF_year1:Reallocation_CF_year5)
4. Opportunity Cost Analysis:
excel=Reallocated_Resources*Productivity_Factor*New_Product_Margin
5. Customer Retention Probability:
excel=IF(Customer_Cross_sell_revenue>50000,0.7,IF(Customer_Cross_sell_revenue>10000,0.5,0.2))
Step 4: 5-Year Financial Projection
Let's compare keeping vs. discontinuing the product over a 5-year horizon:
Scenario | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | 5-Year Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keep Product | ||||||
Revenue | $1,140,000 | $1,083,000 | $1,028,850 | $977,408 | $928,537 | $5,157,795 |
Gross Profit | $136,800 | $129,960 | $123,462 | $117,289 | $111,424 | $618,935 |
Support Costs | $357,000 | $364,140 | $371,423 | $378,851 | $386,428 | $1,857,842 |
Overhead | $122,400 | $124,848 | $127,345 | $129,892 | $132,490 | $636,975 |
Net Profit | ($342,600) | ($359,028) | ($375,306) | ($391,454) | ($407,494) | ($1,875,882) |
Discontinue | ||||||
Wind-down Costs | ($175,000) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ($175,000) |
Cross-sell Retention | $340,000 | $357,000 | $374,850 | $393,593 | $413,272 | $1,878,715 |
Reallocation Revenue | $315,000 | $472,500 | $614,250 | $675,675 | $743,243 | $2,820,668 |
Reallocation Profit | $110,250 | $165,375 | $214,988 | $236,486 | $260,135 | $987,234 |
Net Profit | $275,250 | $522,375 | $589,838 | $630,079 | $673,407 | $2,690,949 |
Difference | $617,850 | $881,403 | $965,144 | $1,021,533 | $1,080,901 | $4,566,831 |
Step 5: Customer Analysis
Customer Segment | Count | Revenue at Risk | Strategic Value | Retention Probability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strategic Multi-product | 12 | $425,000 | High | 70% |
Mid-tier Single-product | 38 | $670,000 | Medium | 20% |
Small/Declining | 35 | $105,000 | Low | 10% |
Step 6: Resource Reallocation Analysis
Resource | Current Use | Potential Reallocation | ROI Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Sales Team (1.5 FTE) | $1.2M revenue | $1.8M potential revenue | 50% |
Support Team (2.0 FTE) | Cost center | $1.2M revenue support | Profit center |
Manufacturing Space | Low-margin goods | High-margin alternatives | 3x margin |
Management Focus | Problem resolution | Growth opportunities | Qualitative |
Step 7: Recommendations
Based on the comprehensive analysis, discontinuing the product line appears to be the optimal decision because:
-
Financial Improvement:
- Current product is losing $326,000 annually with declining trajectory
- Discontinuation provides $4.57M positive impact over 5 years
- Even with conservative assumptions about resource reallocation, the company benefits significantly
-
Resource Optimization:
- 3.5 FTEs can be reallocated to higher-value activities
- Manufacturing capacity can be repurposed for higher-margin products
- Management focus shifts from problem-solving to growth opportunities
-
Risk Mitigation Strategy:
- Develop migration path for strategic customers to alternative solutions
- Create retention program for multi-product customers
- Consider phased discontinuation (12-18 months) instead of immediate shutdown
- Establish account management protocol for affected strategic relationships
Implementation Plan:
-
Phase 1 (1-3 months): Internal preparation
- Develop customer communication plan
- Create inventory runoff strategy
- Prepare sales team with transition offers
- Design resource reallocation plan
-
Phase 2 (3-6 months): Strategic customer communication
- One-on-one meetings with top 12 accounts
- Develop customized transition plans
- Introduce alternative solutions
-
Phase 3 (6-12 months): General discontinuation
- Announce to all customers with 6-month notice
- Begin resource transition
- Implement cross-sell initiatives
- Monitor customer retention metrics
Would you like me to elaborate on any specific aspect of this analysis? For example, I could provide more detail on customer retention strategies, develop a detailed transition timeline, or create additional financial scenarios.
Best Practices for Cost-Benefit Analysis
When using Finyna for cost-benefit analysis, keep these best practices in mind:
-
Be comprehensive with costs and benefits: Include all direct and indirect costs, tangible and intangible benefits.
-
Use appropriate time horizons: Consider the full lifecycle of the decision, not just immediate impacts.
-
Account for opportunity costs: Always evaluate what could be done with the same resources allocated differently.
-
Quantify intangible factors when possible: Attempt to assign monetary values to qualitative benefits for better comparison.
-
Conduct sensitivity analysis: Test how changes in key assumptions affect outcomes to understand the robustness of your conclusion.
-
Consider multiple scenarios: Evaluate best-case, worst-case, and most likely scenarios.
-
Include risk assessment: Identify potential risks and their likelihood to make more informed decisions.
-
Look beyond financial returns: Consider strategic alignment, organizational capabilities, and competitive positioning.
Finyna can help you implement these best practices and create sophisticated cost-benefit analyses that provide a solid foundation for sound business decisions.
Finyna Strategy Team
Financial analysis and AI expert at Finyna. Specializing in creating AI-powered tools for financial professionals.